Hey.

Today another new rule has been added:

Administrators may ban for any reason they deem fit, as long as it is approved by the Emperor or Empress.

This rule has been implemented because it is the administrators' job is to keep the DSGHQ safe and sometimes the reason we ban someone cannot be said publicly or doesn't fix perfectly into another rule.

This rule applies for the whole DSGHQ and is in effect starting now.

Good rule. Shows authority.

Tennis wrote on 7th September 2015 08:29 PM:

Hey.

Today another new rule has been added:

Administrators may ban for any reason they deem fit, as long as it is approved by the Emperor or Empress.

This rule has been implemented because it is the administrators' job is to keep the DSGHQ safe and sometimes the reason we ban someone cannot be said publicly or doesn't fix perfectly into another rule.

This rule applies for the whole DSGHQ and is in effect starting now.

I like this new rule! Sometimes people say "THAT'S SO UNFAIR, AN ADMIN BANNED ME!!11"

I have a feeling this is about Ace. Anyways, does this include mods?

Oh, cool I will enjoy dis affect > !!!! oke nice bye c:

Now Administrators don't need a reason to ban and their decision will never be "unfair" or "unjust." I like this new rule. The DSGHQ is getting more authoritative as it progresses each day. Love it.

Sounds quite fair enough.

This is my opinion and my non mean honest opinion:

I disagree

Thanks for the update!

i disagree with this rule

I have a bad feeling about this...

There isn't a problem with this. Administrators are responsible enough to handle this and Damen and Chelsey have the final say on it anyway.

Hi Tennis!
Honestly, I disagree and I don't entirely, but mostly agree with Ace's justification. It's not because I'm his sister, it's because I just don't think this is right. The ban reasons are just bad sometimes. And it's not just what happened today, it's been happening for a while now. The ban reason is something like "weird" or "stupid" and to me, that's not a reason really. It's like how you ask parents why and they say "because I said so." That's pretty much saying "because i can". And that's what this rule is pretty much. If admins want to ban, it doesn't matter what the reason is, they can ban because they can. As a matter of fact, there is no reason even needed. I think the ban reason should always say what rule they broke otherwise it wasn't necessary imo. The ban reason is just name-calling sometimes and name-calling is being rude and there is a rule to not be rude. I understand that keeping DSGHQ safe is important, but if the ban reason isn't something good, there was no lack of safety that the specific user was causing. And I know the higher powers have to approve it anyway, but they too occasionally ban simply because of their negative thoughts on a certain user without them breaking any rules apparently. Those are just my personal thoughts although I respect your opinion. Not trying to cause any trouble here
~~me

I like this new rule. We can trust the admins to ban for fair reasons, and now users can't say it's unfair. No offense to the users, you're amazing even if you do get banned, not saying that you will.
-Jassie