6th September 2021
83 views

critique on new rules

Made by ian in The Lounge

Banned
2,542 posts
3,622
Seen 30th August 2023
6th September 2021, 06:25 PM

The invasion concept is cool but losing an entire military? Flame, Rouge, and myself have put a lot of time and energy into Eclipse so losing it seems a bit harsh. I think a suspension of the military, or temporary disarming would be better.
5

+1 by Flame, Foxel, eugee, rouge and 1 other

hi
Member
647 posts
1,616
Seen 31st August 2023
6th September 2021, 07:49 PM

When you use a military, you can basically have an unlimited amount of wars that they can fight with. It is better if militaries switch hands, especially to change up power dynamics.
0

+1 by turquito10 and Flynn, -1 by eugee and Mercer

Banned
2,542 posts
3,622
Seen 30th August 2023
6th September 2021, 08:08 PM

Miro wrote on 6th September 2021, 07:49 PM:
When you use a military, you can basically have an unlimited amount of wars that they can fight with. It is better if militaries switch hands, especially to change up power dynamics.

I dont see why it has to be deleted, I think disarming or suspension are better alternatives.
0

hi
Member
647 posts
1,616
Seen 31st August 2023
6th September 2021, 08:12 PM

weend2014 wrote on 6th September 2021, 08:08 PM:
Quote:
Miro wrote on 6th September 2021, 07:49 PM:
When you use a military, you can basically have an unlimited amount of wars that they can fight with. It is better if militaries switch hands, especially to change up power dynamics.
I dont see why it has to be deleted, I think disarming or suspension are better alternatives.

It wouldn't be deleted, it would be transferred to the winning side, always could be won back.
1

+1 by Flynn

Alatar
Banned
130 posts
242
Seen 30th May 2023
6th September 2021, 08:43 PM

I don't think that'd work well - giving up the military to the side they just lost to would cause some complications.
2

+1 by rouge and Flynn
aaaaaaaaaaalatar

Login or join the forums to reply.